Reid, For the sake of the debate, I wish you provided your references from 2000.
Here are the papers from Ross Anderson reported by the press: http://www.ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/async2002paperV2.ps http://www.ftp.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/faultpap3.pdf both 5/9/2002 Regards, --FL Reid Carlisle wrote: > > This is not a new attack. I have seen references to this dating back to > 2000. Most silicon vendors of merit have been aware of this class of > attacks and have countermeasures designed into their design. It is poor > reporting on behalf of the press not to do thorough research for such an > inflammatory story. Two that we use, Infineon and Atmel, are aware of the > issue and are not susceptible. > > Reid > -- "When entrusted to process, you are obligated to safeguard" from Bob Johnston, CISSP *************************************************************** Unix Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E. (Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment) http://www.linuxnet.com/ To unsubscribe send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe sclinux ***************************************************************
