Walter Franzini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 05:46:49PM +0200, gregor wrote:
> > a ct-api should named like this:
> >
> > ctapi-nnnnn.xyy.so
> >
> > where n is a "well know identifier"
> > x the major-no of the release
> > y the minor-no of the release
> I suggest to use a different naming convention:
> libctapi-nnnnn.so.xyy
> whit the lib* prefix we can link a specific ctapi implementation whit
> -lctapi-nnnn
> Take a look to libtool :)
>
> --
> Ciao Walter.
>
OK, you're right.
but then i would prefer
libctapi-nnnn.x.yy.so
because, there is no need for symoblic links
bye gregor
***************************************************************
Linux Smart Card Developers - M.U.S.C.L.E.
(Movement for the Use of Smart Cards in a Linux Environment)
http://www.linuxnet.com/smartcard/index.html
***************************************************************
