Fair enough, re-raised there. Its https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329132 if anyone is especially interested.
thanks, Richard On 19 April 2016 at 20:58, Honza Horak <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually Dave was right, packages updates like your case are best to be > tracked in RH Bugzilla, since RHEL is the primary focus for SCL and that is > where it can be evaluated properly. > > Honza > > On 04/07/2016 01:52 PM, Richard Hodgson wrote: > >> Ah, thanks for the example ticket. >> >> I'll raise in the Centos buildsys project, as that seems to be where >> everything is moving. >> >> Richard >> >> On 5 April 2016 at 16:35, Dave Johansen <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Richard Hodgson >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We use the python27 SCL that provides Python 2.7.8, which has >> worked brilliantly for some time on our application >> servers. Recently, we started seeing deprecation warnings from a >> Python module ("urllib3") related to SSL connections urging us >> to upgrade python to the latest 2.7.x release. >> >> Whats the best way to request an updated version of an existing >> SCL package? Should I post here or raise a ticket somewhere in >> the Centos bug tracker? >> >> >> Opening a bugzilla worked in the past: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167912 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Richard Hodgson* >> Chief Technical Officer >> >> >> bricklane.com <https://bricklane.com> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SCLorg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg >> >>
_______________________________________________ SCLorg mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
