What i mean is that with our products, we'll always provide an implementation by default
and if a user prefer an other one, he'll change the provider implementation.
I think we must be independant of implementation in scm url and it must be the user that
choose the implementation like a user can choose a svn client between svn command line,
eclipse plugin, tortoiseSvn..., svn url is always the same.
If you provide a java implementation for starteam instead of stcmd, i don't think it will
be the default because we can't distribute the starteam jar. If a user have stcmd on his
machine, do he have too the starteam jar or do he need to install it separately?
Emmanuel
dan tran a écrit :
Emmanuel
It seems that you would suggest that if we need to retire stdcmd
implementation?
if java implementation is available?
-D
On 11/3/05, *Emmanuel Venisse* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
you must have only one implementation of a provider in classpath
Emmanuel
dan tran said:
> I thought the second token is specific for each provider.
> Currently starteam provider implementation will work with all
starteams
> However, with starteam's java implementation, it works with 6.0+.
> so how would scm manager knows which implementation to pickup?
> -Dan
>
>
> On 11/3/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>> No, I don't want to use a different url format for an equivalent
>> provider.
>> So user can choose it's provider implementation without change
the scm
>> url
>> in pom
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> dan tran said:
>> > starteam has java client too. What would the scmurl looks like?
>> > scm:starteam-java:xyz
>> > -Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/3/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's a planned feature but I have no time to do it
>> >>
>> >> It will be interesting to use a java client too for cvs
>> >>
>> >> any volunteers?
>> >>
>> >> Emmanuel
>> >>
>> >> Arnaud HERITIER said:
>> >> > Hi guys,
>> >> >
>> >> > Can't it be interesting to take a look at this library [1]
to use
>> it
>> >> in
>> >> > the
>> >> > svn provider instead of the command line ?
>> >> > Is there someone who already used it ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Arnaud
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] http://tmate.org/svn/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
