Ali Bahrami wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> 
>    I'm getting closer to filing the RTI for the mapfilechk
> stuff:
> 
>      6798660 Cadmium .NOT file processing problem with CWD relative file 
> paths
>      Contributed by Richard Lowe
>      6785284 Mapfile versioning rules need to be more visible to gatelings
>      6800164 Standard file exclusion mechanism needed for Cadmium tools
> 
> I think it works. I've built and installed SUNWonbld on my system, and
> plan to use it for a couple of days. However, I'm looking for other
> ways to exercise it before it going back.
> 
> Mark mentioned to me that you have tests for cadmium. Would it be
> possible to somehow test my workspace against them?
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> - Ali

Yep.

You can pull a copy of the repo from 
ssh://anon at hg.opensolaris.org//hg/scm-migration/scmtest, then cd into 
src/legacy/scm/tooltest and read the README there.

I don't think you need to worry about the TET-harnessed stuff, but 
others may certainly complain otherwise.  (Is that even populated?)

The abstraction of the comment checking should be tested effectively by 
the cddl check tests, you're welcome to add mapfilechk tests if you're 
so inclined.  I don't think that should block your integration, but 
again, others may speak up...

--Mark


Reply via email to