I reckon the interest list for the webrev bug is as good a place as any to
seek code review. I'm not an HTML guy, so I did a pretty generic
seek-and-replace for ;<\([^ ]+\) \(.*\)/>;<\1 \2></\1>; in the webrev
source.
The two different webrevs are
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mjnelson/webrev.481/
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mjnelson/webrev.481-firefox3.0/
...with the only difference being that the second was generated with the
modified webrev.sh, so it displays properly on firefox 3.0.
And just to be clear, I'm asking the scm-migration-dev team for review of
bug 481 (testing still in progress), and the other folks for review of
6716179 (testing as demonstrated by referenced webrevs as viewed on
firefox 3.0).
--Mark
