* James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> [2008-07-08 13:57]: > That means that we really do need to stop usage of /ws/onnv-gate as a > gate, and use hg the way it was meant to be used -- with > ssh://onnv.sfbay/ instead. Yes.
> If /ws/onnv-gate exists at all, it needs to be just a copy of the > source code itself, rather than an actual Mercurial repository. (I > know some people cd over to the gate and run cscope; that usage should > probably be preserved.) It could continue to be shared read-only; I don't believe we have any scripts for pulls (or, at least, I was trying to eliminate the TeamWare scripts for bringovers so we wouldn't...). - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/