* James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> [2008-07-08 13:57]:
> That means that we really do need to stop usage of /ws/onnv-gate as a
> gate, and use hg the way it was meant to be used -- with
> ssh://onnv.sfbay/ instead.
 
  Yes.

> If /ws/onnv-gate exists at all, it needs to be just a copy of the
> source code itself, rather than an actual Mercurial repository.  (I
> know some people cd over to the gate and run cscope; that usage should
> probably be preserved.)

  It could continue to be shared read-only; I don't believe we have any
  scripts for pulls (or, at least, I was trying to eliminate the
  TeamWare scripts for bringovers so we wouldn't...).

  - Stephen

-- 
sch at sun.com  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/

Reply via email to