Vladimir Kotal writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > <snip> > > > It's not *that* bad when the cache is reasonably warm: > > > > % time hg status -mardn usr/src > > usr/src/uts/common/io/bridge/bridge.c > > 4.50u 2.03s 0:07.52 86.8% > > % > > Is this file system cache or some kind of Mercurial cache ?
Normal file system -- ZFS. I don't know of any Mercurial caches. > If the > former then the limit of its helpfulness might be somewhat limited for > non-developer kind of folks (i.e. folks not spending majority of their > time in single workspace). In my case (which is not unusual for person > switching between number of bugs in different technologies), the number > of active Nevada workspaces on my workstation stays around 30 or so. Good point. That'll likely not stay so warm, and will be slow. I do think that Mercurial could do with some caching to speed things up, but I'm not so sure that manual administration of the list is the way to go with this. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
