Mike Kupfer writes: > - I made a random guess and put down Jim C working 25% on technical > issues.
Sounds fair enough. > - Are there things on the list that we don't need to do? I'm willing to > drop items from the list (after discussion), but I'm not willing to > reduce effort estimates until we have a track record of meeting > existing estimates. I probably need a more complete description of some of those items, but these look mostly good to me. I'm not sure what fits in "more stuff TBD," but at a guess, this is actually "fixing any fall-out from the SFW migration so that ON doesn't see it." > The effort estimate for bugs do *not* include the hg_trans bugs in > Bugster. I plan to fix that next week (see the "bug review" task). Do you need a volunteer to do those sccs keywords sweeps? I know Rich had a set of diffs at one point, but I haven't heard anything about it since then, and I would imagine that he's doing more useful work on cdm at the moment. > - Are the effort allocations for me and Jim correct? It seems right to me. > - I need a better understanding of how we'll be doing testing. Will Jim > Walker be running tests for us, or will the developers being doing all > the testing? And we need to finalize the test plan. We've never had automated testing for these tools (which is really a pretty serious problem for anyone working on them), so I think we're going to have to rely on extensive testing by individual developers. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
