Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> writes: > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 15:14 -0800, Mike Kupfer wrote: >> >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com> writes: >> >> Bill> Last I checked, the bugs that spawned bringovercheck have pretty >> Bill> much all been slain, so it could be retired now even for teamware. >> >> If there's stuff that can be done now and it doesn't depend on the other >> SCM Migration changes, I'd rather that someone just go off and do it >> now, rather than adding it to the 16,840 lines of change that we already >> have. > > I've been holding off on this in part because I didn't want to slow you > guys down by making you merge with random other putbacks to ON. But if > you don't think it's going to be a problem....
I'm fine with merges, thus far they're not bad at all, though changes to nightly are somewhat complicated because of the amount of code that moved around. Worst case, I'd have to ask for some input to complete the merge accurately but I don't think bringovercheck and sccscheck would be that bad to merge in (unless I'm missing something). -- Rich
