Follow-up Question: Provided there is a way to do what's described below, how then would a "recommit" be handled?
It's surprising that a "commit" can work on individual files, while the "recommit" can only work on all of the changed files at once (no apparent options). Thanks, John John Ojemann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out how to handle commit and push for the scenario > where you have multiple bugs being fixed, but they don't all address > every file being touched. > > Clearly, it's ugly to do a single commit where all bugs appear in the > log for every file; but is it acceptable to do an individual commit for > each file, and then do a single push? > > The result of doing it that way pushes multiple changesets (same number > as however many commits were performed), and the individual file logs > are then updated as desired. > > Is this a proper/acceptable way to handle it? > > Thanks, > John
