>>>>> "Mark" == Mark J Nelson <Mark.J.Nelson at Sun.COM> writes:
Mark> ...or you can use: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html Mark> (and then this works for off-SWAN folks) True, but there could be confusion in the future, if the web page on selenic.com refers to a version that is different from what's bundled in (Open)Solaris. Mark> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/Pull Mark> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/Merge Mark> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#diff This has the same possible consistency issue as above. But if you think the benefits of having hyperlinks here outweigh the confusion risk, I could certainly put in these links (and use selenic.com for the hg man page link). Let me know what you want to do. >> A draft putback.html and diffs are also available. Mark> First bullet: it might be time to lose "sparc" vs "sparcv9" Mark> differentiation. Sure; removed. Mark> Missing bullet item: after the "header file" and "EXPORT_SRC" Mark> items, do we need something about open-only builds? Good idea. I've added a bullet about that. Mark> "All relevant machine architectures" now includes sun4v, dom0, and Mark> domU. I've added those. Is it worth distinguishing "sun4v" from "MP sun4v"? Mark> We still do adb? :) I took out the adb reference. Mark> Should "CDE" be something else now? Changed to "GNOME/JDS". Mark> For the versioning info link, we do NOT want to refer to spec Mark> files. Rod will hunt us down and kill us. We should point this Mark> to /ws/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/README.mapfiles. And the last part Mark> of that sentence ("...for updating/creating..." can be whacked. Okay, I've made the changes that you requested, but please review that bullet to see if more work is needed. Is 2002/300 still the right PSARC case to point people at? Mark> As Rich pointed out, the req.flg should be worded in a way that Mark> makes it clear that it's still relevant, mainly for xref. Maybe Mark> something like "Did you update any appropriate req.flg files, so Mark> that 'make cscope' in the directories you're changing will pull in Mark> the appropriate context for these changes?" I reworded that item; please review. Rich also suggested a reminder to review diffs, so I added that (before the one for pbchk). I've posted a new version of putback.html and putback.diffs.txt, and I've added diffs since the previous version (for putback.html). mike
