Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:59:55PM -0700, Mike Kupfer wrote: >>>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> writes: >> stevel> What do you guys think is the likelihood of getting all of these >> stevel> fixed in time by mpm? >> >> Mike> No idea. What does Matt think? >> >> Matt> Think about what? I just got here. >> >> We've got a list of Mercurial issues that we think we need to have fixes >> for before we actually cut over from Teamware to Mercurial. >> >> We're trying to figure out what that does to our migration timeline. >> >> The current list is >> >> 122: commit succeeds if merge fails >> 132: hg should revalidate its data after l... >> 199: detect corrupted dirstate >> 222: [extensions] in a repo's .hg/hgrc fi... >> 226: Strange hgmerge invocation behaviour >> 269: hg mv should handle newly added files >> 274: localrepo.add() fails to unlock >> 401: Problem with "hg rm -A" after "hg mv" >> 413: hg add mishandles subprojects >> 455: Mismerge involving two concurrently ... >> 498: unreliable tag computation when tags... >> 522: hg st of a merge changeset shows pha... > > It'd be helpful to prioritize these. Some of them are easy, some are > hard, some are of questionable merit. >
Well, it's actually good all around if we misread some of these, and they aren't what they seem. :) It'd be good to see the list broken down into those three categories. -- Rich
