stevel> So... do you guys think I should include mention of driver/modinfo
stevel> strings?
Not if there are already bugs for them that are marked with hg_trans.
If we're going to call out specific subsets of the hg_trans bugs, I
would focus on the ones that are likely to cause incorrect behavior,
such as the class action script bugs.
stevel> Anything else I missed?
I'd mention what alias people should email if they have questions. I
guess that should be scm-migration-dev...?
In fact, if we can give a little guidance on "replacements", that might
be helpful (and cut down on the amount of time we spend answering
questions). So, maybe the heads-up mail can include some text like
If the module version can be determined by other means (e.g.,
showrev(1) output), you may simply wish to delete the keywords.
What do you think?
I'm assuming that once you've sent the heads-up mail, we should update
the "user-visible" CRs that Rich filed, to indicate that we're not
working on them. This would include
- removing the oss-sponsor keyword (if set)
- removing me as RE
- changing RM from Bonnie back to the original RM
- attaching the diffs that Rich sent out a few weeks ago
Let me know if you disagree.
mike
