>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
Rich> My current thinking is that we should put up packages, announce Rich> their existence and cut our bits over to them, then work on Rich> getting it (or a later release, if 0.9.5 appears) into sfwnv at a Rich> later point As long as our 0.9.4 package does not conflict with the sfwnv package, that sounds fine. OTOH, if our 0.9.4 package is in reality a pre-integration sfwnv package, that could be a problem, particularly if it takes us awhile to update sfwnv. mike
