Richard Lowe wrote: >> And as for commit roles, it is still completely unclear how commit >> rights are going to be allocated - for example are these managed >> centrally for all ON committers, or does each project that contributes >> to ON manage its own pool of committers? In the absence of any such >> design decisions, it is difficult to come up with a database design. > > My understanding is that that would be the role of the community > behind a consolidation, regardless of interests others may have in > specific parts. Nothing else is workable.
Do we have such a community for ON? The ON community doesn't appear to be such a beast, it seems to be a ragbag collection of projects that should probably live elsewhere. What would such a community look like? Would it just have one project, the source gate that it maganed, or some other structure? > I have no idea *which* members of the parent community, and I fear the > kind of political stupidity such questions tend to cause when voiced > too loudly. Sssssshhhh! They might be listening! :-) -- Alan Burlison --
