Richard Lowe wrote: > Stephen Lau <stevel at opensolaris.org> writes: > >> Mike Kupfer wrote: >>>>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: >>> Rich> I don't seem to have a copy of wx2hg that looks like it would need >>> Rich> to merge >>> >>> See attached. >>> >>> Rich> (and, beyond that, I'm yet to see an occaision where it would need >>> Rich> to merge). >>> >>> This is to handle conversions that happen after the gate has moved to >>> Mercurial (when it's no longer possible to synch up the Teamware >>> workspace with the current clone). >>> >>> Rich> Further still, are you really intending to land wx2hg in onnv-gate >>> Rich> ahead of the rest of this stuff? >>> >>> Good point. I guess it can wait until we put back the other tools >>> changes. Are we going to cherry-pick what's in onnv-scm, or are we just >>> going to putback everything in the onnv-scm usr/src/tools? >> I think we'll probably end up putting back everything in onnv-scm, >> which I believe is usr/src/tools modifications + 1 >> usr/src/Makefile.master change. >> > > I'm not convinced the tests belong in the gate... > > -- Rich
DTrace did it, so can we! :-P I'm ambivalent. I've never believed tests should be in the ON gate, but if that's the new model - so be it. I'll defer that decision to Dave... I'm perfectly fine pulling them out or leaving them in. -steve -- stephen lau // stevel at opensolaris.org | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
