Richard Lowe wrote: > Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> writes: > >> Richard Lowe wrote: >>> Stephen Lau <stevel at sun.com> writes: >>> >>>> ==== cpio archives build errors (DEBUG) ==== >>>> >>>> Failed to create generic kernel archive: 150320 blocks >>>> Failed to create generic root archive: 10170 blocks >>>> cpiotranslate: etc/dev: no packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/amd64/scsi_vhci_f_asym_emc: no >>>> packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/amd64/scsi_vhci_f_asym_lsi: no >>>> packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/amd64/scsi_vhci_f_sym_emc: no >>>> packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/amd64: no packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/scsi_vhci_f_asym_emc: no packaging >>>> info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/scsi_vhci_f_asym_lsi: no packaging >>>> info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci/scsi_vhci_f_sym_emc: no packaging info >>>> cpiotranslate: kernel/misc/scsi_vhci: no packaging info >>>> >>> Is this a clean workspace? >>> Those changes shouldn't even be *in* our gate right now. >>> >>> -- Rich >> I assume its grabbing those from closed-bins. >> > > Then we need to snag the closed bins at more appropriate junctures > for the onnv-scm build, you can't just pull new ones nightly and have > the build not be mysteriously noisy.
Yeah - I need to have it match up and make sure it pulls the matching on-closed-bins. For this test (had to tweak sendmail so mail could get out of the lab to opensolaris.org) I just grabbed the latest closed-bins. -steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
