On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:30:01PM -0600, Ali Bahrami wrote: > Richard Lowe wrote: > > Will Fiveash <William.Fiveash at Sun.COM> writes: > >> While we are on the subject, is it feasible/reasonable for the hg cdm > >> extension checks to support some form of exemption lists that are found > >> in the repository? The idea is that instead of having personalized > >> *.NOT files, there would be a set of standard check exemption list files > >> located in a standard path as part of the gate repository source which > >> the hg cdm check commands would consult. These lists would be part of > >> the hg repository and would get pull'ed when one creates a local repo. > > This is almost exactly what Ali did when implementing mapfilechk I > > believe. > > 6800164 Standard file exclusion mechanism needed for Cadmium tools > > -- Rich > > _______________________________________________ > > scm-migration-dev mailing list > > scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/scm-migration-dev > > > I believe that all you need to do is create a file in the exception_lists > subdirectory of the workspace, using the same format as the mapfilechk > exception file that's already there, and Cadmium will apply those > rules to the files it passes to the command. > > This is the same format used by the hg .NOT files. > > Of course, I only have one data point (mapfilechk) to support that > claim, so let us know... :-)
Sure, I'm interested in creating various *.NOT files for the Solaris krb code that we port over from MITKC. I'll look into this and let y'all know the outcome. -- Will Fiveash Sun Microsystems Office x64079/512-401-1079 Austin, TX, 78727 (TZ=CST6CDT), USA Internal Solaris Kerberos/GSS/SASL website: http://kerberos.sfbay.sun.com http://opensolaris.org/os/project/kerberos/