On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 06:23:15PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > > I explicitly (and separately) tested rtichk when I tested "wx pbchk." > > It works, at least for the on-SWAN case. > > Right, the xVM guys use it. Part of the problem is that while it > works in the ideal case, it a least used to be incredibly (and > uselessly) noisy when things went wrong. I think John may have fixed > that.
Yep. > It also used to misreported errors in the off-SWAN case, such that it > would tell me there was no RTI for my bugs, rather than that I > couldn't reach webrti.sfbay My memory fails me if I fixed that too or not. Hopefully it's simple to check :) > > And, of course, our modified rtichk is being used in production _now_. > > It's deployed in Burlington. > > And by everyone(?) working on the Xen part of the xVM stuff, since > that is in mercurial, in production, now. Yes, although as you know Rich, our bits are dreadfully old. regards john
