Dean Roehrich <Dean.Roehrich at sun.com> writes: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 04:45:49PM -0600, Bonnie Corwin wrote: >> AI: Putting 0.9.5 on os.org servers. Will be done as part of more >> general server upgrade plan. IN PROGRESS: Upgrade plan in >> progress on Bonnie's team for the machines that use Mercurial. >> More detail as plan is finalized. >> >> IN PROGRESS > > Is there a plan to upgrade to mercurial 1.0 at any time and has anyone been > using cadmium with it? I've tried a handful of cdm functions on my project's > repo, and my clone of the mercurial 1.0 repo, and haven't found a problem yet.
There is a plan to move to 1.0 or, hopefully, 1.0+patch for an issue I hit yesterday. I haven't fully looked into how irritating that specific problem may be, however (mercurial issue1052, for reference), but it's a regression from 0.9.5. I have run cdm against 1.0 (it was cdm's tests that noticed the bug mentioned above, though mostly by chance), and do not currently know of any changes required to cdm and surrounding. I have no specific goal for when 1.0 would go into Nevada (and I'm not even entirely certain it would be me who did that work, though I have a partial set of changes for it). -- Rich
