* Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> [2008-01-09 19:51]: > Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> writes: > > > Does cdm have a file where it stores comments, or do > > comchk/comments/bugs all work from the log information? That is, as > > I edit files or hg add new ones, is there an integrated way to keep > > track of bug associations, etc.? (Even an as-we-go commit message > > would be useful.) > > Everything (with some not yet integrated exceptions), is from the Hg > log. > > We have no required local state, at all. I actually like things that > way, for what it's worth. I think that's fine.
> I've said this before (I forget where), but I just keep an untracked > file in the workspace listing bugs. Or put them in commit comments, > so that reci will pop them up and let me edit out the swill. > > Webrev also only lists comments that apply to commits including the > specific file, so the associations of comment->file should be > maintained (except when you reci, where they're lost, of course). So the model usage is (ignoring use of mq, etc.) something like [edits] hg commit [edits] hg commit ... webrev ... hg reci hg push potentially with an untracked file with comments in between commits. Okay, I can manage that. Thanks Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
