Richard Lowe wrote:
> "Mark J. Nelson" <Mark.J.Nelson at Sun.COM> writes:
>
>> U.V. Ravindra wrote:
>>> onnv gks:
>>>
>>> [I hope this is the correct alias to contact. If not, please let me know.]
>>>
>>> /ws/onnv-tools/onbld/lib/python/onbld/Checks/Rti.py needs to be
>>> updated to include the name of the new Nevada STC gate: /ws/stcnv-gate
>>> Could I know how I should go about doing this?
>>>
>>> -Ravindra.
>>>
>>> PS: The absence of this gate's name from Rti.py is leading to rtichk
>>> failures like this:
>>>
>>> $ rtichk -g /ws/stcnv-gate 6731189
>>> Incorrect gate name specified: ERROR: CLI_BugsterSearch::___map_gate() -
>>> Incorrect gate name stcnv-gate
>>> RETURN_CODE=5
>>>
>>> FWIW, stcnv-gate will have it source organized under a split
>>> "usr/src, usr/closed" hierarchy similar to onnv-gate.
>>>
>> This code lives in the onnv-gate.
>>
>> You may file an RFE against it, under { solaris, consolidation,
>> os-net-tools }.
>>
>> You're welcome to then fix that RFE, and use
>> scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org and/or gatekeeper at onnv.eng.sun.com
>> to
>> solicit code review and/or CRT advocacy.
>>
>> If you file it and want somebody else to fix it, you'll need to include
>> your sense of urgency and probably provide some testing support.
>>
>> The tests for this live in a separate area, I can provide you info if
>> you need.
>
> That error is from WebRTI, not our code. We don't do any of the name
> mapping, WebRTI (in theory) does it for us (except, as above, when it
> doesn't...)
Sorry, I gave a half-assed answer. Our code will still need to be
modified to update the regular expression we use to identify a gate name
as a "test gate," to set the RTI and gate types appropriately.
But the actual mapping is webrti. The right approach to get that fixed
is to file an RFE against webrti/webrti/rtidb, I think. But there's
another piece missing here, maybe--do you already use webrti to handle
requests to integrate to the stcnv-gate? Because if so, it seems like
there should already be such a mapping in the database, and if not,
you'll need to provide more than just a mapping, you'll need to work
with (I assume) Larry and team to get your whole RTI form specified.
In any event, the two RFEs above (onnv tools and webrti) are the
appropriate way to start the ball rolling.
--Mark
--Mark
