>>>>> "Jim" == James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes:
Jim> Since we're not including gpyfm in the initial putback and we're
Jim> not planning to include it in an internal (or external) code
Jim> review, is there any objection to removing these two from the
Jim> depends-on list?
In isolation, I'm okay with that. And we might as well downgrade their
priority, too (P5?).
I'm a little concerned about the bigger picture, though. I guess we're
assuming folks will be able to use meld for a GUI merge tool. Which is
okay with me, as long as we're willing to gate our putback on
6648443 meld to be included into SFW consolidation
mike
