Richard Lowe writes:
> which_scm.1:26
> 
>   'which_scm', not 'webrev'

Oops; yes.  Will fix.

> There's a few places (webrev, nightly, ws, xref) which don't
> explicitly deal with the case where which_scm knows which SCM is in
> use, but the tool doesn't really know what to do with them.

OK.  I'll go back over these, review them myself, and tighten up all
the cases I can see.

> I'd be especially concerned if that in combination with the extra SCMs
> which_scm will detect lends an illusion of support for those extra
> SCMs that doesn't in fact exist.
> 
> I'd also like someone else to take a look through this, rather than
> just me.

Sure thing.  I've waited a while to put this out there.  I can wait a
while longer for more eyes.  ;-}

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to