Richard Lowe writes: > > I'll test by building the tools alone, and making sure that the > > resulting cdm and wx work, and checking the wx man page. > > My only comment is a query. Is there a reason not to just link > directly to the page in the second set of changes to wx.1? I know > we'd be repeating the same information, but it seems nicer than making > people dig the link out (I imagine http://onnv.eng is less link-heavy > than the base ON community page).
My inclination is to rip out the duplicate reference entirely. I went for direct parallelism instead: the original has a link to the wx page first, and then a line to the base page second (with a "see wx in" note). I guess I don't care that much. It sounds like you (at least slightly) prefer a change, so I'll reword the text and make the second one a link to the wx page as well. > Other than that (which I don't care that much about), it looks fine to me. OK; thanks! -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
