Stephen Lau wrote: > John Plocher wrote: >> When we talked earlier about this, you had indicated >> that you had ideas about future formatting (xml...) etc >> and that this csv file was a short term prototype. In >> addition, at some point, I want to have a database available >> on OS.o where this structured information can be found and >> manipulated; at that point in time, this csv file would >> be obsolete. >> >> So, in ARC terms, I consider this file, its content, and >> the frequency of update to be contracted project private >> interfaces, with a single existing contract between me >> the SAC ARC team) and the WebRTI team. >> >> Your use for any SCM migration would be a second contract. >> >> >> I'll leave it to you to create the contracts so you can >> enumerate the things that are important to you as a >> consumer.
[I never got the above, could someone moderate John through?] > If at some point you have a database that is query-able, then that would > be better - but in the meantime, as long as the format (and location) of > this csv file is stable - that's fine by me. Ditto, there's things that could make it nicer, but it being present and correct is far, far more important. > If you need a formal contract drawn up, then we can do that. But I'm > fine with just taking you at your word ;) > > cheers, > steve >
