> Is there a particular reason you want your script to execute 
> on the machine running the daemon instead of the machine 
> hosting the repository ? This isn't clear to me yet.

The application that is required by the "run command" is located on the
Daemons machine (in this case a PDF conversion tool)

> I am not against doing it. I am still trying to understand 
> the benefit of Scmbug. e.g. you could have achieved the same 
> effect by running rshd or sshd on the server and executing 
> scripts there (you still wouldn't have to write an extra 
> daemon).

I'm unable to use sshd and rshd as we are running our repository and
Daemon on Windows machines.

> So, were you hoping to do it inside Scmbug because 
> you could have e.g. the list of affected files, or the 
> version number of the update, etc. If not, then wouldn't rshd 
> and sshd offer the same benefit ? Unless I see some benefit 
> Scmbug would add, then I don't see why it should be supported.

It doesn't use any of ScmBug "knowledge", it purely runs the command.
It's not a problem, I'll create another Daemon process to handle the
command.

Cheers, Rob
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Reply via email to