Hi Robert, thanks for the patch. On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 08:28 -0700, Robert Hudson wrote: > > With a proposed fix. I have tested it on my test system and it seems > to work OK. > > > > It is nothing fancy, but I thought that it would at lease plug a whole > where data may currently be lost. > > > > I suppose one thing it does raise is the possibility of tool that can > be run that will re-generate the given post commit command and update > the Bug if required.
I am not happy with the approach taken here. If there is an error with a backend, the error should be reported and the commit should be aborted. That is the fundamental premise of all the verification checks. I won't apply the fix. I believe bug 1014 is invalid.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
