On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 04:18 -0700, Robert Hudson wrote: > > > Hi Kristis, > > > > Please can I ask a big favour? Is it possible to integrate the > following changes in: > > > > http://lists.mkgnu.net/pipermail/scmbug-users/2007-October/001288.html
Applied some of them... but not all. > http://lists.mkgnu.net/pipermail/scmbug-users/2007-October/001290.html Applied. > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1051 Please see: http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1051#c3 > > > And then do something like a 0-22-01 release? Sure. I was hoping I'd have some more fixes for auto resolution, but they can wait. > > The reason I ask is that I managed to get assigned the time for > verifying and updating our version of ScmBug on the argument that we > would be using an “Official Version” rather than my patched up > version :-) > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
