On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:00 +0200, Uri Shohet wrote: > The website is probably incorrect about the current version. I guess that's > why I took an older version.
It wasn't incorrect. > Anyway, upgrading to 0-22-1 solved both my problems :-) 0.19.20 was not stable. Instead of stabilizing 0.19.x I chose to move forward with the automatic status resolution work for which I had a pending patch for over 2 months, and to merge the Bugzilla 3.x support, that has been pending one failed test case for about 2 months. > Thanks Robert and Oliver! > > Uri > > On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Oliver Schäfer wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Is the website right with it's current stable version? > > > > 0-22-1 is probably the best for Bugzilla 3.0.x support. > > > > -- > > Oliver > > > > On Oct 24, 2007, at 2:31 , Robert Hudson wrote: > > > It's the version I'm using, but I'm not using Bugzilla. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > scmbug-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
