Who ever said that programs should be installed in "Program Files" ? Is
that a public standard ?

The problem is that Windows *USERS* assume programs must always be
installed in a fixed path that Windows decided to change all of the
sudden.

Programs don't need to always be installed in a fixed path. They can be
installed in C:\Perl, C:\Temp, D:\Windows\System, etc. If Windows was so
picky, and formal to want to have all its files installed in the same
path, a path it would NOT change between releases, then it would have
NOT used drive letters, but fixed paths. e.g. /usr/bin, like most of the
universe. That would have made sense. Oh no. Can't do that.

I will not spend time releasing a Windows version that contains in
its .zip file all Scmbug files intented for "Program Files" and another
64-bit Windows version that contains in its .zip file all Scmbug files
intented for installation in "Program Files (x86)". I will not also
release a version that does not list the Scmbug files under "Program
Files" *or something close to it* just to confuse users and have them
asking where they must move files. "Program Files" it is, and is not
changing.

Even if the .bat files use %ProgramFiles%, the contents of the .zip file
cannot be dynamically moved (and don't even suggest that).

If anything, I am only inclined to change the Windows version to install
in C:\Scmbug to better outline this Windows problem.

It's the 23rd century. Get on with the times Windows. Adopt standards.


http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1079

Resolved: won't fix.

On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 00:59 -0800, Tsahi Asher wrote:
> there's another twist to this: is scmbug a 32 bit program or a 64 bit?
>  does this depend on the version of the Perl interpreter? i actually
>  installed the 32bit version of ActiveState Perl, because i couldn't get
>  the packages i needed for Bugzilla with the 64bit version. what does this
>  make of any Perl script?
> 
> the problem of the absolute paths is a problem by itself. you can
>  certainly imagine someone having his Program Files folder on a drive other
>  than C, for example. you should always get the %ProgramFiles%
>  environment variable, and not use absolute path. note that at least on 
> Windows
>  Server 2003 x64, there are two environment variables: %ProgramFiles% and
>  %ProgramFiles(x86)%. maybe you should test for the existence of the
>  later to determine the system type.
>  
> --
> The day Micro$oft sells something that doesn't SUCK
> is the day they start selling vacuum cleaners.
> http://www.geocities.com/tsahi_75
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Thorsten Schöning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:37:18 PM
> > Subject: Re[2]: [scmbug-users] error in parameter to diff on win64
> > 
> > Guten Tag Kristis Makris,
> > am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 um 19:17 schrieben Sie:
> > 
> > >> on Windows Server 2003, 64 bit (btw, on this system 32bit
> > programs
> > 
>  should be in "Program Files (x86)", and not "Program Files").
> > 
> > > This is certainly another bug:
> > 
> > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1079
> > 
> > > Is there a way we can dynamically discover whether a Windows
> > machine
> > 
>  is
> > > 32-bit or 64-bit ? Is there some environment variable we can
>  consult
> > > that accurately reports this ?
> > 
> > One shouldn't need to identify the version of Windows because Windows
> > redirects the API calls for each 32 and 64 bit programs
> > automatically. If a 32 bit program needs %ProgramFiles$ it gets for
> > example C:\Program Files (x86), else a 64 bit program gets C:\Program
> > Files. The problem with the standard SCMBug-Zip for Windows is, as I
> > think, that a absolute path is saved.
> > 
> >
>  
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/win64/win64/running_32_bit_applications.
> > asp
> > 
> > Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> > 
> > Thorsten Schöning
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thorsten Schöning
> > AM-SoFT IT-Systeme - Hameln | Potsdam | Leipzig
> >  
> > Telefon: Potsdam: 0331-743881-0
> > E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Web:     http://www.am-soft.de
> > 
> > AM-SoFT Potsdam GmbH, Konsumhof 1-5, 14482 Potsdam
> > Amtsgericht Potsdam HRB 12480, Geschäftsführer Andreas Muchow
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > scmbug-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scmbug-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Reply via email to