Thanks for the testing patch. A question I have is do you have to change the
status of bugs after you've run the testsuite in order to reset them back to
a previous status ? Would these tests fail if the testsuite is run twice
without manually resetting the status of the involved bugs in the bugtracker
?

I would assume that in order to ensure testing status resolution is reliable
one would need to dynamically create a bug, set it to the expected status,
and then run a test case against it (and then close the bug). This is
certainly quite complicated to do, and something we don't have the testing
infrastructure to do now.

On 12/29/07, Oliver Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You have to add to bugs.bugzilla.inc:
>
> TESTSUITE_BUG_STATUS_CHANGE=8
> TESTSUITE_BUG_STATUS_CHANGE_DUPE=9
> TESTSUITE_BUG_STATUS_CHANGE_ASSIGNEE="[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> services.com"
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 29, 2007, at 10:24 , Kristis Makris wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the patch. I'll review it as soon as possible. Can you
> > also send the patch for status changes ?
> >
> > On 12/29/07, Oliver Schäfer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:Hello Kristis,
> >
> > appreciate your efforts in supporting me. Attached you'll find a
> > patch for Bugzilla.pm.in which
> >
> > fixes http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=948
> > fixes http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1061
> > fixes http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1082
> >
> >
> > It has been tested on Mac OS X 10.4.11, SVN 1.4.x, Bugzilla 3.0.2,
> > and it passes ALL tests. I also created some test cases for status
> > changes in tests/svn. If you are interessted I can send you a patch.
> >
> >
> > I had no more issues regarding http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?
> > id=1084 , with the exception of recognition of sed's version, but
> > it's not relevant at runtime.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
scmbug-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users

Reply via email to