I agree that supporting real multiple bug trackers from within the same daemon is the best solution. However, I wasn't familiar enough with the scmbug code to think about tackling that task. It would definitely make the whole system configuration issue easier to deal with.
Andrew Webber MTS, Controller Software Engineer Digital Receiver Technology, Inc. (301) 944-9217 -----Original Message----- From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:17 PM To: Webber, Andrew Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [scmbug-users] Multiple server instances On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:08 -0400, Webber, Andrew wrote: > My company is looking to setup a slightly complicated bugzilla > installation with two separate bugzilla databases running > simultaneously on one server. It looks like bugzilla supports this Andrew, how do you also feel about the idea of having a single daemon supporting multiple bug-trackers ? Think of the glue sending to the daemon the name of a configuration instance it would like to use. E.g. a daemon may support integration to unlimited bugtrackers, which are all configured in daemon.conf. The benefit would be that we don't need to specially prepare additional init.d scripts per daemon, support "multi-site" installations so to speak in Debian, multiple startup scripts in Windows in the future, etc. _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
