On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 05:49 -0700, Robert Hudson wrote: > [Rob] Thanks for the suggestion but doesn't this require access to the > underlying DB? - We currently use the OLE interface. (BTW: I don't claim > to be a QC expert - just picked up the bare minimum to implement the > integration). Also getting that a bug has been modified isn't enough - > we need to check that a particular formatted comment has been added.
Scmbug already contains logic that checks if a a bug contains a particular formatted comment. It needs this logic because an issue-tracker may contain user comments that were not added by Scmbug; comments that were added by a user describing the issue. This logic is already in place.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
