Hi Kristis, I will use the patch format in the future, just a little not used to it but will do.
Thanks, Uditha -----Original Message----- From: Kristis Makris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 June 2009 01:41 To: Uditha Atukorala Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Scmbug - Bugzilla 3.2.3 possible patch Hi Uditha, Please send all communication to the mailing list. Thanks a lot for submitting this. I'll try to look into the changes and apply it. Quite a lot of people are waiting for support for Bugzilla 3.2. Could I ask that in the future you supply the changes in patch format (using diff -prauN) instead of sending an entire file over ? Thanks again, Kristis On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 08:39 +0100, Uditha Atukorala wrote: > Hi, > > > > Possibly you must have had solutions already but anyway attached > Bugzilla.pm module could be a possible patch to get Scmbug 0-26-15 > working with Bugzilla 3.2. This should also take Bugzilla 3.2 custom > states into account (which we are using). I haven’t tested it with > Bugzilla 3 yet so needs verification. > > > > I am using this in production so if there are any bugs I will be > fixing them myself and if I get a reply from you I will keep you > updated. > > > > Thank you for making Scmbug open source. > > > > Regards, > > Uditha > > > > _______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
