I'd love to merge a clean solution.
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:49 -0700, Martin Goff wrote: > We have it working with multiple daemons right now. We are refining > the process. It appeared noticed during my research that no one had > actually implemented multiple daemons. Is that correct? If so, would > you like us to post our solution? > Martin Goff > Software Development Alternatives, Inc. > [email protected] > 928-632-9946 (work) > 928-632-9943 (fax) > > "Effective teaching is the essence of leadership..." > > > > > > Kristis Makris wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:18 -0700, Martin Goff wrote: > > > > > I've been researching how to run integrate multiple Bugzilla databases > > > with multiple SVN repositories. After we finally got a single > > > repository with multiple products working, we were instructed to > > > separate them into individual repositories. > > > > > > As near as I can tell this means we need to run a separate instance of > > > the Scmbug daemon (with its own specialized daemon.conf) for each > > > Bugzilla/SVN Product pair. This means we will need to run upwards of > > > 20 instances of the ScmBug daemon. > > > > > > Is this correct? > > > > > > > This is correct. > > > > > > > Or can one instance of the daemon serve all of the Bugzilla/SVN > > > Product repositories? > > > > > > > We haven't worked on this yet, although some patches had been submitted. > > > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=279 > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
