Hi Don, Scmbug does not support BugTraq; it has not implemented a BugTraq backend yet, and there are no plans for implementing one.
About Bugzilla 3.2 support, there are some patches for that, and a lot of people have reported getting it to work. You will need to apply a patch from http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1073#c23 http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 The reason Bugzilla 3.2 support is not provided yet is because it is still unclear what is needed to support Bugzilla 3.2. We are getting reports from people saying they tried different things to get it to work, and no clean patch has emerged yet. There is a plan to move forward at the end of October. There are patches for Bugzilla 3.4, too, and Bugzilla seems to be one of the most frequently used issue-trackers that Scmbug integrates with. I hope this helps, Kristis On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:44 -0700, Don M wrote: > All, > > > I am wondering about the state of ScmBug, we are setting up a CM > system and want to use BugTraq and ScmBug, but ScmBug does not work > out of the box, and all the docs I find online, say that ScmBug does > not support Bugzilla 3.2.2 yet. Just wondering if there is a plan to > move forward, at some point as Bugzilla continues to update? > Any information would be greatly appreciated. > > > Thanks > Don > > > _______________________________________________ > scmbug-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
