Yavor, many thanks once again. You are amazing! I know I need to push for merging all these patches you've sent. I'll try to get to it soon.
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:41 +0300, Yavor Nikolov wrote: > Hi, > > We've been successfully using scmbug with Bugzilla 3.6 since it's been > released (after a bit patching). However I haven't used version > tagging in production. > Anyway - I've just tested that feature and I have a patch for it > (attached) which seems to resolve the problem in my test environment. > > (Error messages are still a bit ambiguous on error /whatever fails > always Integration.pm reports that no product exists with such name/). > > Best regards, > Yavor > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 06:58, Kristis Makris <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Thanks for reporting this. > > http://bugzilla.mkgnu.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1473 > > Scmbug does not support Bugzilla 3.6 yet. Personally I have > not tested > it against 3.6, although I wonder if Yavor, who has ran Scmbug > against > Bugzilla 3.6 might be able to provide some insight. > > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:59 +0200, Michal Kašpar wrote: > > Error.pm:102:Bugzilla::Error::_throw_error - You are not > allowed to > > edit properties of product 'TestProduct'. > > I haven't found where scmbug "authenticates" with BZ when > branching. > > > I think that's really the issue. Some sort of logic like: > > my $userid = Bugzilla::User::login_to_id( $username ); > > is definitely missing from the routines that handle tagging. > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ scmbug-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mkgnu.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scmbug-users
