On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Managan, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > I need a refresher on what the best workflow is for small changes. > > In the emails from Martin Geisler around May 8 2012 it sounded like we were > going away from named branches for small simple additions. > > I am not seeing any changes yet > on http://scons.org/wiki/SconsMercurialWorkflows and was not quite sure what > the procedure is.
I did update it a few weeks ago: "Then to work on a bug or feature the simplest thing is to work directly on the default branch. Feature branches are not usually needed except for long-term development, but you're welcome to work that way if you like. You can just make your changes (including doc and tests); when you're happy, commit them, and push:" -- Gary _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
