OK, Chris' argument has won me over – no contest always use a repository for long-lived work. I am sure I could get by with multiple heads and bookmarks but I haven't tried it and so don't have a feel for a good workflow. Using a separate repository makes things easier.
I will withdraw the current pull request since it involves a named branch, rework the diffs into a new clone of SCons mainline, see if I can add some extra tests (ones that are meaningful not just gratuitous ones to pass the "must have tests" test) and tidy things up so as to make a platform for more revolutionary changes. I am no fairly convinced that separate dmd, gdc and ldc tools (with a common core) are actually required. Also dropping support for D version 1 and working solely with D version 2 seems not to have caused uproar. Thanks. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
