Hello, here is the small exchange which I recently had with the author of Bento in regard to SCons vs waf support in his tool:
<quote> Hi Gour, On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello! > > After having some adventure hoping that tools within D community would > evolve (mostly GUI bindings), we're back to Python world...hoping to > use Python3 + Cython + (most probably) wxPython. > > Bento seems the nicest solution and considering we have a need to build > some extension (using Cython) I'm curious about waf vs. scons support > in Bento. > > Based on what I see, there is already support for waf, but I must say > that SCons docs were more digestible to me, so I wonder if there is any > plan to add SCons support in the nearby future or you are simply > satisfied with waf and recommend it over SCons? The main issue with scons is that it is not really usable as a library (unless they massively improved the situation in the last one year or two), and waf codebase is easier to follow. While it should be possible to add support for scons, it won't be a priority for me. David </quote> which maybe might be interested for SCons devs... Sincerely, Gour -- The senses, the mind and the intelligence are the sitting places of this lust. Through them lust covers the real knowledge of the living entity and bewilders him.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
