On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Chris BeHanna <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 19:33 , William Deegan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > All, > > On Oct 25, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Chris BeHanna <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Oct 25, 2012, at 15:07 , "Managan, Rob" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Chris, > >>> > >>> Thanks for the info. Sounds like I should have the Install function > check > >>> that the version numbers match. In the use case where Install does not > >>> know what the version number is then I will believe the one in the > library > >>> name! > >>> > >>> Of course, in the example from Eric Raymond on OSX there is only one > >>> symlink and the version number is located differently. > >> > >> Yes, it's very, very different on OS X. OS X uses "Mach-O" format > rather than ELF, and spells ".so" as ".dylib", plus it reverses the order > of the version number and the file type suffix: > >> > >> libcurl.so.4 => libcurl.4.dylib > >> > >> Mach-O also uses a "compatibility version" that is distinct from the > version that appears in the filename. :-/ > > > > Does the implementation work with both linux and OSX? > > If I can find time, I'll test it soon--I have Linux and OS X > available. I do not have a current version of MSVC to test on Windows, > though. > I can also run tests on Windows, Linux (RH and Ubuntu) and OSX (10.7, 10.8). Just point me to a repo with the test cases. -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
