On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 08:43 -0800, William Deegan wrote: […] > I don't think the community has really said that it's essential in the short > term either from the previous email thread.
I think what you say is correct, but I have had a number of people comment to me that SCons is the only reason they have Python 2 loaded, and that it is irritating them. I just haven't managed to get them to say this on these email lists. > In my book (not speaking for SCons as a whole), it's a nice to have which > will help some (of the very few) for whom installing a non 3.x python would > be a difficulty. I think though the time is right to have a codebase that runs under Python 3 as well as Python 2. There is now significant evidence that it is possible to do this. Thus it is not a Python 2 OR Python 3 issue but a Python 2 AND Python 3 one. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
