On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28.04.2013 20:20, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Given the current system is XML based, with xml files and in files >> required, the new system is an improvement and should be accepted. >> > > Glad you agree, I feel the same way. This way all the doc uses the same > source language and in the same way, with a much more consistent (and > verifiable) pipeline. I want to review some of the non-PDF generated stuff > to make sure it's all there (as well as the old system did anyway), but > Dirk, why don't you start prepping a pull request. Once it's in we can > sweat the details (Russel's list is good to start). Bill, what do you > think? > > > I am ready to prepare a pull request any time...if we all agree that the > current status of my experimental branch is good enough to go, I'll latch > on. > The only thing I might suggest prior to a pull request would be to build the docs into the build dir. > Would you rather like the pull request to be one single commit, or should > I transplant all my single revisions for having a history that makes single > changes/decisions more trackable? > In a git world, I like to clean up commits into small but meaningful units. In mercurial it's not as easy, but if you can do it it's helpful for forensics. -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
