On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 10:12 +0000, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: > Those of us who aren't so active and are still on python 2.6 are going to be > less happy, especially if we aren't entirely in control of which version of > python we get to use.
<< I thought I had replied to this, but cannot see it. If an earlier version turns up, sorry for the duplication. >> RHEL appears determined to stay with Python 2.6 and I guess many other have to as well. I was originally for the 2.7 floor to get at all the backports of 3.3 stuff as and when. However if there are many SCons users in need of executing on 2.6, and now that we know many projects who are being Python 2 and Python 3 compliant are choosing 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3+ as their compliance list and succeeding (*), I wonder if SCons should revert the 2.7 floor decision and consider a 2.6 floor decision. (*) 2,5 and earlier are ignored as are 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
