Hi Rupert,
On 26.09.2013 09:24, rupert THURNER wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Gary,
On 26.09.2013 02:08, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
[...]
what are the main things which make waf, and wonderbuild so much
faster than scons? a test is here, but already a little outdated:
http://retropaganda.info/~bohan/work/psycle/branches/bohan/wonderbuild/benchmarks/time.xml
the main difference between SCons and waf/wonderbuild regarding run
times for updates is, that the latter two don't offer a "recursive
variable substitution" feature (the subst() method in SCons).
Additionally, wonderbuild is trimmed to speed by sacrificing
correctness, e.g. it's CPP scanner doesn't care about "#ifdef"s.
Waf handles this much better, I guess...but I didn't check its sources.
Regards,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
