Anatoly, I still don’t understand. Are you asking a question? Or making a statement? If either what is the question/statement?
-Bill On June 2, 2014 at 3:30:10 AM, anatoly techtonik ([email protected]) wrote: Sorry for not being clear. This is a new description that I wrote. I lack experience in both Autotools and SConf, so it is my best understanding what SConf does and I like to make sure that it is accurate. It can be that I've missed something or put things wrong. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:28 AM, William Deegan <[email protected]> wrote: Anatoly, Are you saying that it is not accurate? If so, in what way? Your email is not clear. -Bill On June 1, 2014 at 2:57:02 AM, anatoly techtonik ([email protected]) wrote: Hi, While looking at the SConf code I've tried to explain what does "Autoconf-like configuration support" means. It would be nice if you can check that description is accurate: """SCons.SConf Autoconf-like configuration support. In other words, this package allows to run series of tests to detect capabilities of current system and generate config files (header files in C/C++) that turn on system-specific options and optimizations. For example, it is possible to detect if optional libraries are present on current system and generate config that makes compiler include them. C compilers do not have ability to catch ImportError if some library is not found, so these checks should be done externally. """ -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
