Scons 2.3.0 was compatible with 2.4. Scons 2.3.1+ required 2.6 breaking the version claimed by all documentation. On Jul 17, 2014 3:49 PM, "Bill Deegan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dirk, > > I believe the pre-announced floor was 2.7 was announced with 2.3? > With an intent to not break 2.6 if it could be done without pain. > > So website and docs should be changed. > > -Bill > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> a bug report about the allegedly broken Split() method, my comments and >> the submitted patch to reach backward compatibility for Python 2.6 have >> caused some confusion. >> >> So, I'd like to ask again: What is our current Python floor version for >> development ("default" branch)? My understanding was that we had agreed on >> already allowing "Python 2.7 only" changes some time ago. But SCons 2.3.2 >> and the website claim that we're still compatible with 2.4 and up. >> >> We either have to agree on supporting 2.6+2.7 for the current release >> 2.3.2, or the webpage has to get amended. And for the upcoming release we >> have to properly announce and make the clear cut to "2.7 only". >> >> Best regards, >> >> Dirk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
