On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 12:15 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: > On 10.08.2014 11:02, Russel Winder wrote: > > I am wondering if it should be policy for later duplicates to be marked > > as duplicates of earlier issues, rather than earlier issues being marked > > as duplicates of later ones? > > > I've seen earlier duplicates that had the better information, or > additional patches/testcases attached. In those cases, I always chose to > mark the "later" issue as duplicate of the first...I'd really like to > continue making this decision based on information, not on modification > dates.
OK works for me. Whatever works for the people actually doing things rather than pontificating on them :-) -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
